Does the "Even if you proved evolution happening right in front of me right now, I will not believe in it."...?

There really is no way to maintain that the Bible is consistent with evolution (or other facts) and still maintain that it is inerrant. Basically you have to throw out everything that happened before the "Kingdom of David", while realizing that this may not be the same David as recorded by the Bible and then come up with some rationalization why other parts of the Bible refer to Adam, Noah, Moses and others as real. The only way to do this is to redefine "inerrant" as "myth that I believe in even when soundly contradicted by the facts".